Nominations for Edublog Awards

Here are my nominations. It was difficult to put these together as I have learnt lots from many different blogs and people over the past year.

 

Individual Blog – Sue Waters Blog http://suewaters.com/

Students Blog –http://cazro2320.edublogs.org/   because it is entertaining and informative with a mix of facts and opinions.

Class Blog – http://blogs.henrico.k12.va.us/jwherod/   because we have learnt a lot about Mrs Herod and her class whilst sharing the reading of Charlotte’s Web.

Teacher Blog – http://murcha.wordpress.com/  because I have learnt a lot from reading and following Anne.

Admin Blog –

Individual Tweeter – George Couros   – always willing to share ideas and resources.

Twitter Hashtag – #glread12    first time I have been involved in this, and have been inspired by possibilities of this medium.

Free Web Tool – Animoto – kids love it. Visual medium makes it powerful.

Best Open PD – Global Ed Conference, especially the Australian components.

Social Network – Twitter
EdTech Blog – Educational Technology and Mobile Learning http://www.educatorstechnology.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

High Support High Challenge

Hammond_SA_keynote_2012

Last Friday I attended the Literacy Leader’s Conference at EDC. One of the speakers was Jenny Hammond from the University of Technology, Sydney. I found her presentation interesting, inspiring and relevant to our school. She has written a research paper in the most recent ALEA Journal (Vol 35, No 2, 2012) Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, on the same topic.

Her presentation focused on findings from her research exploring language learning of EALD (English as and Additional Language or Dialect) students within the Science curriculum. Although she focused on Year 6 and 7 students you could see the relevance for all levels.

Her main message was to provide a High Challenge/ High Support environment.

The article in this month’s ALEA journal was referred, and I have just finished reading it.

Hope and Challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL Students and their teachers
Jennifer Hammond, University of Technology, Sydney

Some key points made:
* English area specifies the content in terms of language, but other curriculum areas don’t
* the ‘how’ isn’t specified in the Australian Curriculum (our department makes this pretty clear through the TfEL model though)
* curriculum hasn’t been watered down for EALD students, or those with learning disabilities, although differentiation expected
* demands of the new curriculum are high
* high levels of differentiated support expected for EALD students in particular to be successful
* thorough knowledge of the area needed by the teacher to be able to deliver
* EALD students need support to develop language in all curriculum areas not just English, so the specific and technical language of other curriculum areas needs to be explicitly taught, exposed through a wide variety of methods – oral, visual, encouraged conversations, reference material around the room written, pictorial, etc. (This is an aspect I would like to focus on.)
* importance of Vygotsky’s model of Zone of Proximal Development used to scaffold learning
* Language demands of various text types explored and made explicit, as well as the structure and function

Things to do:
* Plan carefully, having a clear picture of the language demands of the topic.
* Use scaffolding, building to independence
* Have a reference point in the classroom
* Criteria for success includes use of technical language

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Global Ed Conference

Over the past two evenings I have taken part in two Global Ed 2012 Conference sessions. The first, run by a teacher in country Victoria, showed me what students can do by running their own Blackboard Collaborate sessions.
The second tonight, run by a teacher in Western Australia, showed the possibilities in terms of projects that teachers and students can connect with, and the many benefits.

I am amazed at the possibilities and would like to trial some of these new ways of working with students. I have begun to see the benefits of Edmodo, and Twitter, and would like to explore Sykpe further.

Possibilities:
http://thesunnythoughtproject.wikispaces.com/
http://elearning-rajettan.blogspot.in/
http://workonlittledreams.blogspot.com
http://aroundtheworldwith80schools.net/
karenstadler.wordpress.com
http://crazycrazes.wikispaces.com
http://globalclassroom2012-13.wikispaces.com
Twitter:
@Tina
@MrsSchmidt
@David
@sebastianpanaka
@ICT_Integrator

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

PD – Pupil Free Day

Positives

  • People appreciated the opportunity to work together in like year level groups.
  • Constructive outcomes in terms of planning – literacy and numeracy
  • Data Management system well received and teachers entered their data ( a few hiccups that will need to be sorted out)
  • Generally positive outcomes from  programs and students learning
  • Consistent feedback about opportunities to work together – admin meeting every second week, year level, curriculum area, whole school focus rotated on a 3 week cycle.
  • More people wanting to share and combine resource data bank – ideas for units of work (related to particular texts, maths concepts etc.)
  • Blog resources

 

Areas to improve

I felt my presentation was a bombardment of information without clear direction for staff. Next time be focused and resource that area so that participants are set up to succeed. Don’t give too much scope.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Wave Intervention

Wave 1,2,3! I agree with the philosophy behind this model. How can I enact it in my classroom efficiently?
I feel as though I am on the right track with Wave 1 and Wave 2. I have been able to clearly identify the Wave 3 students, but struggle to access enough one on one time, daily, consistently, and deliberately, to feel as though the gap is being made up.

Resourcing is a big issue here. How can we maximise available resources? Teacher time, SSO support, and peer learning could all be more effectively utilised.

Identification, goal setting and a deliberate action plan, with built in evaluation are all really important factors.

Discussions with students on new learning, and regular contact with families about short term goals are aspects I would like to focus attention on. Using the Fountas and Pinnell Continuum of Literacy Learning will direct teaching and get to the specifics. Using the short term goal setting idea used in the Daily 5 would be a good way to actively involve and empower students in this process. The Daily 5 structure of Comprehension, Accuracy, Fluency and Expanding Vocabulary would meld really nicely and give focal points.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 17 18 19 20 21 26